Exiting the “I”
- Bradley J Cleary
- Feb 27
- 4 min read

Over the course of A State of Being, we’ve been dismantling something quietly but deliberately.
We began by questioning what we think we know — not just intellectually, but structurally. The way we interpret reality. The way we attach meaning. The way we assume we understand what is happening to us.
Then we moved into Prayer — not as asking, but as orientation. The recognition that we are always in a state of request, whether we’re aware of it or not.
From there, we stepped into something more demanding: everything depends on the vessel. The Light doesn’t fluctuate. The system doesn’t change. What changes is how we receive, how we perceive, how we interpret.
And in the last article, we stood before reality without trying to control it. We learned to resist misinterpretation. To recognise that what destabilises us most is not events, but the way we read them.
All of that has been building toward something more intimate.
Because it’s one thing to speak about perception in principle. It’s another thing to face it in the moment an emotion rises.
This is where the work actually becomes visible. Not in ideas, not in philosophy, not in analysis but rather In the split second when something moves inside you.
Shame. Regret. Anger. A memory you thought was resolved. A sentence someone says that touches something much older than the conversation.
Up until now, I’ve done what many of us do. I tried to understand those moments. I went back. I traced patterns. I explored childhood. I learned how trauma sits in the body. I learned how triggers form. I learned how certain experiences shape the opposite response in adulthood.
And that work had value. It brought awareness. It brought language. It brought the ability to function better in situations that once overwhelmed me.
But it didn’t fundamentally change the authority.
I was still the centre.
Still the one managing the emotion. Still the one trying to repair myself.
Strength can be a defence, and insight more self-protection.
And underneath it, the same structure remained — the sense of separation, the quiet feeling of not being enough, the need to prove something to the world.
What has shifted is not that those emotions stopped appearing. It’s that I’ve shifted to noticing the moment before I attach to them.
There is always a fraction of time where a choice appears. Not a dramatic choice. Not something you announce to yourself.
Just a fork.
Do I follow this emotion into narrative?
Or do I let it pass through and redirect it?
For a long time, I thought spiritual work meant refining the content of the emotion — understanding it better, healing it more completely, integrating it more gracefully.
Now I’m beginning to see that the content isn’t the main thing.
The direction is.
When an emotion rises, it carries force. That force will move somewhere. If I attach my identity to it, it reinforces the “I.” It strengthens the story.
It deepens the separation.
And when so, If I instead allow it to pass through — not suppressing it, not denying it — but refusing to couple with it, something else happens.
The energy becomes available.
And this is where everything we’ve been writing about converges.
Perception.
Vessel.
Faith above reason.
Standing before reality.
They all collapse into this one lived moment:
Which authority am I following right now?
The authority of the emotion?
The authority of the intellect that wants to explain it?
The authority of the wound that wants to defend itself?
Or something higher?
For me, the practical shift has been surprisingly simple: Gratitude.
Not as optimism or denial but as the sensation that redirects.
When shame appears, I don’t argue with it. I ask: what is this revealing? Can I be grateful that this layer is visible instead of hidden?
When regret surfaces, instead of spiralling into self-judgment, can I be grateful that I now have the awareness to see it?
When anger rises, can I recognise the desire for control underneath it — and be grateful that it’s exposed?
Sometimes I don’t feel grateful at all. Sometimes it feels mechanical. But even the act of searching for gratitude interrupts the automatic coupling.
It shifts the authority.
Instead of the emotion deciding who I am for the next hour, I choose.
And when that aim includes connection — when I don’t just work for my own relief, but turn it toward love of friends, toward unity, toward something beyond my private experience — the work changes again.
Because the vessel isn’t built in isolation.
That may be the most confronting realisation in this entire journey.
All the self-work in the world, if it remains centred on “me,” eventually loops back into self-concern. It becomes heavier.
But when you come to properly feel and understand the emotion, it becomes material for connection — when the redirection includes others, includes the group, includes something larger than my own stability — then it becomes something outside of me.
This feels like the next degree.
Not understanding more.
Not resolving the past perfectly.
Not becoming someone new.
But choosing differently in the moment something rises.
Remembering, we are not walking through the Light. We are walking through darkness. That doesn’t mean something is wrong.
It means something is concealed.
And in concealment, authority matters.
And there, is my choice..
Emotion carries information. And within every emotion, we decide which authority governs the moment.
That is the workshop.
That is the shift in perception.
That is where the vessel changes.
Not by erasing what we feel.
But by loosening the grip of the “I” that immediately claims it.
The shame doesn’t define me. The regret doesn’t belong to me. The anger doesn’t have to become me.
They pass through.
And in that passing, something opens — not a new identity, not a perfected self — but a quieter orientation.
I am gently, repeatedly, exiting the “I” that insists everything is about us — and allowing something higher to hold the moment instead.
I'm in a new State of Being.
Comments